As an independent broker, my role is to see, if it is warranted or you ask, whether the company's group insurance is still competitive. It does not follow that switching is always a good idea – a switch has its price and its risks too. This article honestly sorts out when moving pays, when staying is worth more, and what an orderly switch looks like.
Good reasons to switch
A switch is worth considering if the premium has been rising for years while the content has not followed, and a market round shows a real difference; if the operation stumbles repeatedly (slow list processing, cumbersome administration, unpredictable response times); if the company's needs have outgrown the product – a new cover is called for but unavailable, or extending is laborious; or if an important cover element is substantially stronger in other offers on the market. What they share: each is a lasting, documentable experience, not a momentary impression. A good switching decision is two-sided, moreover: not just that the new offer is attractive – the arguments for staying have also run out.
Bad reasons
A small premium difference by itself is the most common trap: behind a few per cent of saving there can stand narrower content – the cause of the difference is what the comparison table reveals. A single bad experience without investigation is a bad reason too: a disputed case has to be seen through to the end first – in a dispute I help liaise with the insurer as broker, where I can – and we decide after that. And "we want something new" is a weak ground as well, without a goal about content: switching is a tool, not a programme.
What to watch when switching
Three risks must be kept in hand. First: in the new contract the waiting periods can typically restart – it happens that the new insurer gives credit for continuous group history, but that is not the default; the details are explained in the article on waiting periods. Second: cases in progress belong to the old contract – they run to the end on the old insurer's channel, the switch does not carry them over. Third: there must be no gap in cover – neither in time (the old ending and the new starting must meet) nor in content (the new package must not be quietly narrower). And the team is owed an explanation too: what changes, what stays – without it even the best switch can breed uncertainty.
The course of an orderly switch
The natural moment for a switch is the anniversary: the termination must happen in writing, within the deadline set by the conditions – typically at least 30 days before the anniversary. Before that – if you ask – the market round runs within the review, the comparison is built, the decision is born; the start of the new contract is aligned with the end of the old, then come the member list, the declarations and the team's information – the same sequence as at the first rollout, as the How it works page describes. And sometimes the round's result is that staying is the thing worth doing – with refreshed terms: that too is a success. The decision is the client's at every point.
A question about your own team? Book a free 20-minute consultation →
