Insights · Rollout step by step

Review on request: going over the contract if you get in touch before the anniversary

Group insurance is not a "sign it and forget it" contract – but it does not demand constant attention either. Its natural maintenance rhythm is the anniversary: once a year it is worth spending one short round on it and deciding whether everything can stay as it is, or it is time to intervene. This article shows what comes together at that point, and what the next year is decided on.

In short: At the anniversary three things meet: the insurer's indexation letter, the past year's claims (loss-ratio) experience and the processing of headcount changes. If the team, the needs and the premium are all stable, a nod is typically enough; on meaningful change we have the market looked at again. If you get in touch before the renewal, I run the competition then too – the decision is the client's.

What arrives at the anniversary?

The insurer typically applies value tracking at the anniversary: the indexation letter contains the correction of the premium and the sums insured, so the cover does not lose its worth to inflation. This is also when the group's loss ratio enters the picture – the ratio of benefits paid out to premiums paid in – which can influence next year's premium. The third element is headcount: the year's movements summed up, and the premium base refreshed. Important to know: the indexation letter is not a decision but a proposal for continuing – its arrival does not oblige you to accept it unchanged.

When is a nod enough?

If the headcount is roughly stable, the indexation moderate, no new need has surfaced and the claims experience was in order, the anniversary is an administrative step: check, approve, done. A ready agenda for it comes from the renewal checklist – a calm year typically asks for about 20 minutes of attention here. Even the nod should be a conscious one: this year's "all fine" is worth something only if we really looked at the numbers – not automatic habit.

When is it worth re-testing?

Five signs at which I propose a market round instead of a nod: a premium rising noticeably with unchanged content; a significant headcount change in either direction; a bumpy service experience (slow processing, clunky policy administration); new needs – a new site, new job roles, a widening executive circle; and sums insured unchanged for years, which inflation quietly hollows out. The signs rarely come alone – two of them together are already reason enough for a more thorough round. When the signs turn into an actual switch and when they do not is a separate article: when to switch insurer – and when to stay.

How it runs, and what my role is

If you let me know before the renewal date, I help with the anniversary round: reviewing the data and, where justified, collecting competing offers from several insurers – with the same method as in the first round, as the How it works page describes. The goal is not switching but good condition: a frequent outcome is that the existing contract stays, with updated amounts or better terms. The advice is free of charge at the anniversary too, and the role split is unchanged: I assess the situation and show the options – the decision is the client's. And whether the benefit works inside the team is worth asking from time to time – the article on measuring satisfaction helps with that.

A question about your own team? Book a free 20-minute consultation →

This article is for general information only; it is not an offer and not insurance, legal or tax advice. The exact terms are always governed by the insurers' current policy conditions; it is worth clarifying the precise tax treatment with your accountant.

Related articles

Let's spend 20 minutes on what this could give your team.

Free of charge, no obligation – by the end you will see your options and the next step clearly.

Book an appointment