The great majority of claims run through in order on the insurer's own channel – that is the fastest route, and most people never need more. This article is about the minority: the stuck and the disputed cases. This is where the broker's help has its real meaning – and this is where its limit lies too.
- In a routine case, the insurer's claims line and online portal are the fastest route.
- A stuck case: no substantive answer for a long time, document requests going in circles, the case status untraceable.
- A disputed case: a rejection with unclear reasoning, a contested disability degree, a smaller-than-expected partial payout.
- Then I help the client, as broker: I go through the conditions and liaise with the insurer – the assessment, however, is the insurer's, and I cannot promise results.
The marks of a stuck case
Three symptoms signal a stall reliably: months pass without substantive feedback; the same record is requested repeatedly, or new gaps surface round after round; at customer service it does not become clear where the case stands and what exactly is missing. A stall in itself is not bad faith – in a large organisation cases can pile up – but leaving it unmanaged is a mistake. For how much waiting still counts as normal, the typical processing times article gives a reference point.
The marks of a disputed case
A case is disputed if a rejection arrives but the reasoning does not make clear which exact point of the conditions it rests on; if the established degree of accidental disability differs substantially from what the medical records appear to justify; if a partial payout is made and it does not emerge why that much; or if the insurer cites an exclusion whose applicability in the given situation is questionable. I sorted the most common rejection scenarios in the common rejection reasons article.
What do I do then, as broker?
First I go through the case's complete file and the policy conditions, to see what the question turns on. Then I put the documentation in order, so that the insurer faces a complete and transparent picture. The essence is the written explanation that cites the policy wording: I help the client with professional reasoning, not with volume, and I liaise with the insurer's claims department. Where needed, I also help with using the insurer's official complaints channel and the financial consumer protection forums. All of this is free of charge for the client – the broker's remuneration is paid by the insurer.
What can the broker not do?
Clear speech matters: it is not I who assesses the claim, and I can promise neither results nor deadlines – the payout is decided by the insurer, under its current policy conditions. What my help gives is the structured dialogue that rests on the conditions – and experience says that in many cases exactly this is what settlement was missing. How this appears in practice, in recurring patterns, is told in the lessons from real cases article.
How to get started
If you feel your case is stuck or disputed: collect the case number, the correspondence with the insurer and the letter about the rejection or the partial payout, and flag it to me – that much is enough for a first review. The How it works page gives a picture of the framework of the cooperation: I assess the situation and explain the options – the decision remains the client's at every point.
A question about your own team? Book a free 20-minute consultation →
