Insights · Industries & situations

Subcontractors: who fits under the company umbrella?

On construction sites, in haulage, at project companies the picture is common: half the crew are employees, the other half work on invoice – on the same site, with the same risks. The question is fair: do the subcontractors fit under the company's group cover? The short answer: it depends on the contract's group definition. The longer answer is this article.

In short: The insured can typically be anyone who falls within the group definition set out in the contract – which can be wider than employment, but not boundless. Involving subcontractors is therefore not ruled out from the start; it is a question to be agreed. And if it does not work, workable alternatives exist.

Who can be insured? The group definition decides

In a group contract the policyholder is the company, and the insured are the members of a defined group – who "fits" is fixed by the group definition in the conditions. This typically builds on employment, but several set-ups recognise a wider circle: people on service contracts, working owners, partners working for the company on a lasting basis. The basics of the role division are clarified in the article on policyholder, insured and beneficiary. The beneficiary is designated through the policyholder company's declaration to the insurer, with the insured person's written consent – in practice, the insured person fills out the nomination form, so the principal cannot decide on their behalf.

Why is involving subcontractors a question at all?

For three reasons. One: a subcontractor is not an employee – for the insurer the question is the group's stability and identifiability; a crew that changes weekly is hard to keep on a list. Two: the tax treatment of the premium and the benefit follows a different formula in a subcontractor relationship than in employment – here especially, it is worth clarifying the exact tax treatment with your accountant. Three: the boundaries of responsibility – the principal's gesture of care must not blur the legal relationship between the two companies. None of this is a counter-argument; it is a list to clarify before requesting quotes. And one consideration that is not about insurance at all: cover does not replace a safe site – it complements it.

What does the insurer weigh?

Typically whether the group to be included is stable, identifiable by legal relationship and maintainable in a list. A permanent subcontractor core that has worked for the company for years is judged differently from crews changing project by project. So describe the circle precisely in the quote request: how many people, what legal relationship, what roles – the decision rests on the insurer's conditions. It helps if the company can demonstrate how durable the cooperation is – a framework agreement, years of joint work.

Alternatives if inclusion does not work

The first route: the subcontractor company takes out its own group contract for its own crew – workable even at a small headcount. The second: the main contractor sets it as a contractual requirement that the subcontractor carry adequate cover for its people on site – we wrote about the industry picture in the construction article. The third: individual policies – more administration and typically a higher per-person premium level; here too, a broker helps with the comparison, with competing offers from several insurers. The right route is decided by the needs assessment; its course is shown on the How it works page.

A realistic situation – as an illustration

A general contractor works with ten employees of its own and a six-person subcontractor crew that has been constant for years. In the quote request we describe the circle precisely; in one solution the crew can be included as part of the group definition, in another the subcontractor takes out its own small-group contract. An invented example – but in reality the sequence of questions runs exactly like this.

A question about your own team? Book a free 20-minute consultation →

This article is for general information only; it is not an offer and not insurance, legal or tax advice. The exact terms are always governed by the insurers' current policy conditions; it is worth clarifying the precise tax treatment with your accountant.

Related articles

Let's spend 20 minutes on what this could give your team.

Free of charge, no obligation – by the end you will see your options and the next step clearly.

Book an appointment